Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ja Esterby"
From fbft
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ok, so Jeff has many funny pseudonyms. Shouldn't this entry just be under the 'Jeff Esterby' page? Maybe as an "AKA: " sort of thing? What's stopping anyone from claiming they were a solo artist with funny alter egos, and making a page for each? Jeff's got 30, at least... | Ok, so Jeff has many funny pseudonyms. Shouldn't this entry just be under the 'Jeff Esterby' page? Maybe as an "AKA: " sort of thing? What's stopping anyone from claiming they were a solo artist with funny alter egos, and making a page for each? Jeff's got 30, at least... | ||
| + | |||
| + | agreed, alter egos should not get pages created...on the other hand if this were actually a band and he performed solo it would be perfectly legit. I think in this case however, unless there's something i don't know about, it shoudl be under his personal page and not an entirely new entry. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I take it back...he performed as a band on a compilation. Guess that makes it legit. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:19, 25 August 2005
Ok, so Jeff has many funny pseudonyms. Shouldn't this entry just be under the 'Jeff Esterby' page? Maybe as an "AKA: " sort of thing? What's stopping anyone from claiming they were a solo artist with funny alter egos, and making a page for each? Jeff's got 30, at least...
agreed, alter egos should not get pages created...on the other hand if this were actually a band and he performed solo it would be perfectly legit. I think in this case however, unless there's something i don't know about, it shoudl be under his personal page and not an entirely new entry.
I take it back...he performed as a band on a compilation. Guess that makes it legit.
